RSS

Monthly Archives: June 2010

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.10

We are at the end of my 10 part blog on films remade by the same director as the original version.  To recap, the seeds for writing this article came about when news broke that director David Cronenberg was going to be remaking his 1986 film “The Fly”, which originally stared Jeff Goldblum in the starring role.  Days later it was announced that French director Géla Babluani was going to be remaking as a big budget Hollywood film his 2005 French film “13 Tzameti”, this time in color.  It was with this news that I set out to research if there ever had been a director who had done this before?  I was curious if any directors in the past 100+ of film making had learned from the mistakes (even if the original were an excellent film) of the original and redone a later version, with years of maturity, money, and experience behind them?

To my surprise, there were many.  I decided to narrow my field of research to 20 different films, thus giving me a total of 40 to watch (I actually watched 42, counting the two mentioned in the section above!)  Even further to my astonishment, I learned that it is indeed quite possible for a director to turn out a better film.  Not surprisingly, I also learned that it’s possible to turn in a turkey as well.

However, even more to my incredulity, and you’ll see after todays final films, the odds were IN FAVOR of the film turning out better!  A total of 12 were equal or better, in my opinion, and only 8 were worse!  Even then, only a few of those were grades lower in my ratings, with many them being only 1/2 – 1 grade lower!

You’ll be happy to know that todays films were my favorites out of the bunch.  Not favorite remakes, per say, but favorite pairs.  Meaning, I thought that the originals were excellent, and the remakes magical.  Surprisingly (or maybe not!), all 4 of todays films were directed by the same director.  A director that, hitherto, I did not know much about.  However, after watching these 4 films, I realized that I had stumbled upon a director of the highest caliber.  A director that I knew would soon garner a position in my favorite directors list (needless to say, I did view a handful more of his films subsequent to this review, solidifying his standing).

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part X

Remake #19

~Director: Yasujirō Ozu~

Original Film: A Story of Floating Weeds – “Ukikusa Monogatari”
Year: 1934
Cast: Takeshi Sakamoto, Chouko Iida, Koji Mitsui, Yoshiko Tsubouchi
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 86 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A wonderful little film that is unlike most others of that era.  The acting is subtle and not overacted, as is so common in other silent films.  The engrossing story of a traveling acting troupe that stops into a small Japanese farming town where the master has a former mistress and son whom he decides to visit, inciting a vengeful current mistress, is beautifully told.  It is evident moments into the film that Ozu was a master storyteller, relying on character mannerisms and subtleties to compel the viewer to stay seated.

The film is a testament to how one little sin can snowball and affect so many people, not just the one who committed the sin.  A truly wonderful piece of film from one of Japan’s most celebrated filmmakers.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake Film: Floating Weeds – “Ukigusa”
Year: 1959
Cast: Ganjiro Nakamura, Machiko Kyō, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Haruko Sugimura, Ayako Wakao
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 119 mins / Color / OAR 1.37:1

An absolutely wonderful film.  Simply put, one of the best.  Wonderful musical score and spectacular script easily make this a huge improvement on an already excellent film (the 1934 original).  Director Ozu has flushed out the story, added some very witty humor, and cast the perfect actors to pull off this story of a traveling acting troupe that stops into a small Japanese farming town where the master has a former mistress and son whom he decides to visit, inciting a vengeful current mistress.  Most of the humorous scenes are part of the side story, which is about the other actors in the troupe seeking to find women to keep company with while in town.

The only question I had regarding Ozu’s direction was the choice to have the actors speak directly into the camera when addressing the offscreen character, instead of an over-the-shoulder or a two-shot framing.  I felt myself being pulled out of the film each time this occurred.

The cinematography is simply gorgeous, with colors popping off the screen in the most vibrant of ways.  The story itself is a simple one, yet powerful in that it shows how one man’s sin will affect so many around him.  A must own.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake #20

~Director: Yasujirō Ozu~

Original Film: Late Spring – “Banshun”
Year: 1949
Cast: Chishu Ryu, Setsuko Hara, Haruko Sugimura, Yumeji Tsukioka, Yoshiko Tsubouchi
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 108 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A gratifying character driven story about a widowed man who desires to marry off his stubborn daughter, lying about his own engagement in order to do so.  This film was an entertaining film, but lacked any real drama.  It served more as a day-in-the-life-of genre  film than a dramatic film in the truest sense of the word.

Interestingly, Ozu chose to have the characters speak directly into the camera when addressing another character, instead of an Over-the-shoulder shot, or two shot.  The second or third time it happens, I no longer noticed it, which is an indication of the quality of filmmaking.

While a very slow moving film, one that likely would never get made today due to the current nature of the flash, bang, cut, music video style films, it was still a very well acted film, with wonderful music, and an interesting peek into middle class life in early postwar Japan.  The cinematography is superb, and truly shows that images can indeed tell a story.  Another case to show that editing isn’t cutting every 3 seconds, but letting a scene play out and breathe to tell a more effective story.

A very well made film.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film:  Late Autumn – “Akibiyori”
Year: 1960
Cast: Setsuko Hara, Yôko Tsukasa, Mariko Okada, Keiji Sada, Miyuki Kuwano, Chishu Ryu
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 128 mins / Color / OAR 1.37:1

A very amusing remake of “Late Spring” changes some things from the original version (strangely enough, the title, as you can see) that give it more drama and tension.  The change from the father widow to a mother widow made the desire for the girl to stay and help her parent instead of getting married all the more dramatic, as the two women go through similar situations with courting men.  Including the fathers friends as the men attempting to marry off his daughter has added delightful humor, as well as a dramatic element of the pressure of men to see their daughters married.

A wonderful jazz score, a script that could be made again today with it’s portrayal of adults and their views on “young kids today”, along with the beautiful cinematography all elevate this film above the previous in a minor way.

Again, as seems to be common with Ozu, there is one directorial decision I still don’t quite understand?  Why Ozu has his characters directly addressing the camera in CU’s instead of an over-the-shoulder two shot is unclear.  Happily, after seeing it for a few films now, I have an opinion on the matter.  I would surmise that Ozu feels it allows the viewer to see inside the soul of his characters, giving them more personality.

A wonderful film through and through.  A true classic.

My Rating: ***** / A

Hope you enjoyed this series.  I’m off now to catch some much needed sleep!!!…

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 4, 2010 in Movies

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.9

Very nearly down to the last 4 films and their remakes.  I trust you’ve enjoyed the articles as much as I did watching the films and writing about them.  In fact, do yourself a favor and take a look at a few of them, if nothing else.  Get yourself geared up for the next wave of remakes coming soon to the local mega-plex.

I’m confident you’ll have as much fun as I did.

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part IX

Remake #17

~Director: Roger Vadim~

Original Film: And God Created Woman – “Et Dieu… créa la femme”
Year: 1956
Cast: Brigitte Bardot, Curd Jürgens, Jean-Louis Trintignant, Christian Marquand
Language: French
Country: France
Specs: 95 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1 – Cinemascope

Film opens with shot of Bardot in the buff, and continues to feature her in revealing clothing, bikinis, nude, and prancing about in the most sexually enticing way.  Little else is needed to be said about this otherwise boring film.  Put some clothes on the woman who earned the term “Sex Kitten” from this film, and you have nothing.  Pointless story of a man who marries a woman known as the town floozy only to have a hard time taming her is without much action, drama, or tension.  In fact, is reeks of Vadim’s similarity to director John Derek (just as Derek made pointless films to showcase his wife’s naked body, Vadim seems to have done the same here with his wife Bardot).

The only thing I could see is that for 1956, this must have sent young men the world over into a frenzy, as this would have been the most titillating thing to hit the screen since the Hayes Code was in effect.

Yawn.

My Rating: *** / C-

Remake Film: And God Created Woman
Year: 1988
Cast: Rebecca De Mornay, Vincent Spano, Frank Langella, Donovan Leitch Jr.
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 100 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

Wow.  I’m not quite sure why this remake of the 1956 film was made other than to feature steamy gratuitous sex scenes with DeMornay (Vadim’s girlfriend at the time)!  It has ZERO to do with the original, other than there is a steamy blonde woman who likes sex as the lead.  We get a silly setup with a woman escaping out of prison, only to be picked up while hitchhiking by a man running for governor.  He returns her to prison where she sees a janitor and decides to have sex with him.  This begins the very unbelievable story of him marrying her, getting jealous of her, her joining a rock band, having an affair with the governor in running, befriending a little boy who is motherless, trying to avoid returning to jail for breaking parole (not sure how having sex is considered breaking parole?), and gets the crowd dancing and cheering her band on at the governors ball she crashed.  Right.

The chemistry between the two leads is absurd, but not as much as the “story”, or lack thereof.  As with Vadim’s original (where it seemed little more than an excuse to feature Vadim’s spouse Bardot in what then would have been on par with what we’re presented with in this film), it is very apparent that story mattered not in this exploitation film, even though that’s not what it aims to be.  None of the scenes feel connected.  Rather, the story comes across as a number of mini vignettes all strung together to attempt to make sense.

I’m being a little harsh perhaps.  Thankfully the acting wasn’t over-the-top bad (“Insert sarcasm here”).

One thing is for certain.  Cinemax surely has this film in rotation at least twice per week.

My Rating: ** / D

Remake #18

~Director: William Wyler~

Original Film: These Three
Year: 1936
Cast: Miriam Hopkins, Merle Oberon, Joel McCrea, Bonita Granville
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 97 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

It’s rare that a film can get the viewer to truly hate one of the main characters.  Thankfully, Wyler has done just that in this tense, gripping tale of lies, deceit, and gossip, and how those three vices can utterly destroy a persons reputation when used with malice.  Granville is simply amazing in her portrayal of the viciously deceptive and controlling wicked little girl.  (If only this had been in 3D, I could have reached out and slapped her character!)

While hints at the original stage-plays story comes across at the start (the relationship between the women is never clearly defined and is quite vague) the story of the alleged affair with the others fiance is so cleverly written and believable it’s frightening.

It’s no wonder why Granville was nominated for Best Supporting Actress.  I’m dumbfounded why Wyler, screenwriter Lillian Hellman, or any of the other brilliant performers didn’t receive any nominations.  A truly remarkable moment in film.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film: The Children’s Hour
Year: 1961
Cast: Audrey Hepburn, Shirley MacLaine, James Garner, Miriam Hopkins, Fay Bainter, Karen Balkin, Veronica Cartwright, Hope Summers
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 107 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.66:1

This remake of “These Three”, while an entertaining film, doesn’t hold a candle to the original.  For starters, the little girl is no longer portrayed as wickedly evil as she marvelously was in the previous film.  The main reason for that would be the accusations in this film are not entirely unfounded, just simply embellished.  That is where the problem with this film lies.  By doing so, the film loses it’s main antagonist; that being lying, deceitful, maliciously slanderous gossip.  The focal point instead shifts to an implied morality tale that it’s wrong to judge someone because they are gay (which is true, but not what the first film was about).  Having the two characters actually have lesbian sexual attraction between them only hurts the plot (which, as stated, worked better as malicious vindictive gossip and lies), and takes away from the tension found in the original.

My Rating: *** / C+

Back tomorrow for the final post in this 10 part series…

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 3, 2010 in Movies

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.8

As I write this article in the continuing series, I think of the current tendency for Hollywood to focus on remakes, reboots, and re-imaginings of previously produced pictures.  I wonder if those behind the remakes have a tendency to first ask the original directors if they would be interested in directing the remake, or if they simply forgo that for whichever director is cheap enough and/or “hot” at the moment?

I would have to do another series of articles to see if my impression is that remakes from different directors usually fare better or worse than the originals?  Considering my most recent visits to the box office, I’m willing to say they are worse off.  The last few remakes that I’ve spent my $15 on were bad enough for me to wish I had waited to Netflix it instead.  At least with the original directors there is a fighting chance they would be as good if not better.

Anyone have an opinion on that?

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part VIII

Remake #15

~Director: Michael Haneke~

Original Film: Funny Games
Year: 1997
Cast: Susanne Lothar, Ulrich Mühe, Arno Frisch, Frank Giering, Stefan Clapczynski
Language: German
Country: Austria
Specs: 108 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

The discomfiting opening title sequence (not what you think!) sets the mood for this eerie disturbing tale.  The movie starts with slow long cuts of a family of three driving through the countryside with classical music playing on the radio, when suddenly, hard-core death punk music begins playing under the titles.  It jumps at you, and juxtaposed with the idyllic family amidst the countryside exterior, is rather jarring.

Cleverly, for the remainder of the film, there are only a few more instances of music, and it is always in the scene, coming from a radio.  This near lack of music lends to an uncomfortable ambience.  Haneke favors very long takes with little camera movement, which immediately reveals that this is not a traditional Hollywood film. This is further solidified by the 3rd act, with its depressing and dark finale.

One puzzling aspect of the film was why Haneke chose to break the fourth wall a few times (the character addresses the audience).  Another even more baffling scene involves a remote control rewinding sequence (I don’t want to spoil anything here, but you’ll see what I mean when you view it!).  The thing I “enjoyed” was the lack of any real predictability (other than the “tag” on the end of the film), even though it left me much too uncomfortable to likely view again.

My Rating: *** / C

Remake Film: Funny Games
Year: 2007
Cast: Naomi Watts, Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 111 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

A nearly shot for shot, word for word (with a few minor changes) remake of the 1997 film of the same name left me unclear of one thing:  Why in the world did Haneke choose to do this?  Don’t get me wrong, this version of the film is indeed a better version, as the actors this time around are simply superb.  Not sure, however, why he nor the studio left in the bewildering elements from the first version that had me scratching my head (the breaking of the fourth wall, the remote control sequence)?  Nor why he didn’t use this opportunity to flush out his script, or make some other minor tweaks to bring the film up another level?  Indeed, as it stands, it seems it would have simply been better financially to “dub” the original into English and bring it here to the States.

Just as the original, obviously, this film is pure “edge of the seat” suspense from the first frame to the last.  Of course, again obviously, my review remains the same as the previous film.  Much too dark for a “third” viewing!

My Rating: *** / C+

Remake #16

~Director: Raoul Walsh~

Original Film: High Sierra
Year: 1941
Cast: Humphrey Bogart, Ida Lupino
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 100 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

An excellent caper film with loads of tense suspenseful drama make this one of the best.  Bogart is simply a wonderful baddy, who is sucked back into his former life of crime to pay back the “big boss” who saw to his early parole.  The film doesn’t have many sour points, other than the portrayal of a “yes boss!” black servant early in the film.  The car chase through the Sierra’s is an early example of fine action, with the tension building around every sharp turn.

A wonderful “gangster” film that any fan of Bogart’s will simply enjoy.

Oh yeah, and the scenery isn’t bad either!

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake Film: Colorado Territory
Year: 1949
Cast: Joel McCrea, Virginia Mayo, Dorothy Malone
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 94 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

This remake of “High Sierra” has had a major overhaul and set as a Western this go around.  The basic script remains intact, with a few minor changes here and there, most notably the ending becoming more of a “Bonnie and Clyde” ending set in some ancient Indian ruins.  While this version features stunning scenery, the acting is a step down from the original, now more akin to B-level status.  The chemistry between McCrea and Mayo is nonexistent, feeling very stale and forced.

Certain elements that differ from the original are the crippled girl is now simply a normal girl, the “inside man” no longer gives up the info because he was nearly killed and abandoned, but turns them in before the heist even happens, and McCrea’s character gets more sympathetic, becoming more of a “Robin Hood” than Bogarts rendition.

The strangest decision Walsh added this time around regards the abandoned Mission storyline.  We see Mayo’s character praying at the cross, we see them desiring a wedding with the monk, we see Mayo tithing the stolen money to the church, and we see the church happily accepting the money and keeping it a secret from the authorities in order to bring back it’s long forgotten congregation.  Very strange message indeed.

An entertaining western yes.  Better than the original?  As Tonto would say, “Me no think so.”

My Rating: *** / C

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 2, 2010 in Movies

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.7

It’s hard to believe that today marks 28 of the 40 films that I am writing about in this 10 part blog!  I am beginning to think, based on my reviews of these first 14 films and their remakes, that the remakes of “The Fly” and “13 Tzameti” by original directors David Cronenberg and Géla Babluani, respectively, have a 50% chance of being better.  That is far better than I would have expected.

How will the last few days pan out?  Will the pendulum swing one way or the other?  Or will Lady Justice’s scales remain evened out?  Read on to find out in…

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part VII

Remake #13

~Director: Kenji Mizoguchi~

Original Film: Sisters of the Gion – “Gion no shimai”
Year: 1936
Cast: Isuzu Yamada, Yoko Umemura, Benkei Shiganoya, Fumio Okura
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 69 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A wonderful story of two sisters who are Geisha’s, one a man-hating, conniving, lying woman, the other a matured ready to settle down woman.  This black and white Japanese film is amongst the best, with it’s excellent story and acting to boot.  The wickedness of the younger sister is so believable, you want to reach through the screen and slap her.  The deceptions she goes through are so engrossing, the broken hearts of the men so saddening, that you soon realize Mizoguchi accomplished something years before multifaceted tales of deception such as “Fargo”, “Magnolia” or “Crash” did.  The way he interweaves the stories is simply astounding.

The film is about prostitutes, so children may not be suitable to see this film.  However, it is a true masterpiece from one of Japan’s early filmmakers.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film: A Geisha – “Gion Bayashi”
Year: 1953
Cast: Michiyo Kogure, Ayako Wakao, Seizaburo Kawazu
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 85 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

This biting tale of Geisha’s in postwar Japan is a sad tale of a young girl who, out of necessity, becomes a Geisha thinking it a position of respect and beauty.  She soon learns that it is nothing more than a second class glamorized prostitute, and her house “mom” is nothing more than a Madame.

While billed as a remake of Mizoguchi’s earlier “Sisters of the Gion”, little resemblance is made to that earlier film, other than both focus on the sad life of a Geisha and both are in Black and White.  A wonderful film that is moving and educational at the same time, with simply beautiful cinematography.

An attempted rape scene is the most disturbing scene in the film, and truly shows the horrors that women in Japan suffered under the guise of entertainers.  Truly a remarkable film from a talented director.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake #14

~Director: Leo McCarey~

Original Film: Love Affair
Year: 1939
Cast: Charles Boyer, Irene Dunne
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 88 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

An entertaining film that has a story too far fetched to believe.  An engaged American woman meets a playboy foreign celebrity man on a cruise ship, where they engage in a love affair.  Days later, they end the cruise with a promise to meet on top of the Empire State Bldg. in 6 months if they are both single.  Surprise, they are, and surprise, they both attempt to meet.  After a car accident cripples the woman, she runs away to Europe, where 6 months later they meet again in a movie theater (all the while they both pine away for each other) and reconnect.

The film does have heart tugging moments, and the acting is very well done.  In fact, the chemistry between the two is spot on.  It’s simply the story that knocks this film down a few notches on my scale.

My Rating: *** / C

Remake Film: An Affair to Remember
Year: 1957
Cast: Cary Grant, Deborah Kerr
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 119 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1 – Cinemascope

This almost identical remake to “Love Affair” improves every so slightly by casting two wonderful actors in Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr, and filming it in beautiful color and Cinemascope.  Much better performances than the already well acted original helped flush out the characters a bit more, adding a little depth to the decisions they make.  Still, however, the story is a little unbelievable, with the whole premise being a bit immature and far fetched at best.  As with the original, the musical segments seem a little out of place, as though they were inserted to add length to the film, or to capitalize on the musical craze throughout films of that era.

Regardless, the film is an entertaining film.  Historically speaking, it’s nice to see a film that received so many accolades from the Academy of that year.

My Rating: *** / C+

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 1, 2010 in Movies

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.